Review of "Jump Lists" version 1

Details Page Preview

Zeitgeist based jumplists for applications. The file-friendly approach puts access to your latest, most recent of favourite documents within direct reach of the application itself: just right-click on a launcher to view files and launch them in the application. Zeitgeist is required for the extension to work. If the menu of an application doesn't populate try to look for a Zeitgeist plugin for your application

Extension Homepage
https://github.com/thoughtmonster/gnome-shell-zeitgeist-extension

No comments.

FAQ

Files

Note: Binary files aren't shown on the web site. To see all files, please download the extension zipfile.

All Versions

Version Status
2 Active
1 Active

Previous Reviews on this Version

gcampax waiting for author
Duplicate of https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/33/jump-lists/ ?
thoughtmonster posted a review
Not a duplicate, but a fork adding support for GNOME Shell 3.8/3.10. Here's the diff over Seif's last version: https://github.com/thoughtmonster/gnome-shell-zeitgeist-extension/commit/d67af4060237ef16a9a7a638a9f0385639cd612d I've been using this on 3.10 for the last month, and have had no issues with stability and/or functionality. I would much rather have Seif merge my changes and update his own version, but the last commit on the github repo was a year ago and I'm not sure if he's active here anymore. In any case, I've sent him a pull request on github.
ag waiting for author
Did you get a response to the pull request?
thoughtmonster posted a review
Nope, no response, and no activity on his extension repositories either... I would venture a guess and say that they are inactive, since the last commit was made over a year ago...
thoughtmonster posted a review
Eugh, I don't think he'll be updating anything, if this[1] blog post is any indicator. So you might as well accept this one, if of course the code is up to standards. [1] http://geekyogre.com/moving-on/
Carlos active
Since there's no response and it's been 5 months, let's accept this one, the code looks ok for me.