Review of "eNet Speed" version 1

Details Page Preview

Live network speed in the top panel with accurate per-day bandwidth tracking, history, and export.

Extension Homepage
https://github.com/meharehsaan/enet-speed

No comments.

FAQ

Files

Note: Binary files aren't shown on the web site. To see all files, please download the extension zipfile.

Shexli (experimental) warning 2

Shexli found 2 issues that may need reviewer attention.

EGO-X-004 warning

extensions should avoid synchronous file IO in shell code

Shell code should avoid synchronous file IO APIs like `GLib.file_get_contents()` and `Gio.File.load_contents()`.

File Operations

  • lib/netMonitor.js:41
    GLib.file_get_contents(`${SYS_NET}/${iface}/${attr}`)
  • lib/netMonitor.js:68
    GLib.file_get_contents(PROC_ROUTE)
  • lib/storage.js:20
    GLib.file_get_contents(this._path)

EGO-L-003 warning

signals connected by extension should be disconnected in disable()

Signals assigned in `enable()` are missing matching disconnect calls in `disable()` or its helper methods.

Disconnect all signals

  • extension.js:80
            this.menu.connect('open-state-changed', (menu, open) => {
                if (open)
                    this._refreshStatsView();
            })

All Versions

Version Status
5 Active
4 Rejected
3 Rejected
2 Rejected
1 Rejected

Previous Reviews on this Version

JustPerfection waiting for author
Is this code generated by AI? If so, we have a rule for that: [EGO Review Guidelines: AI](https://gjs.guide/extensions/review-guidelines/review-guidelines.html#extensions-must-not-be-ai-generated)
meharehsaan posted a review
Yes, I used AI during the development of this extension. I used it mainly for assistance with writing and improving parts of the code, debugging issues, and finding solutions to implementation problems. As I understand it, the EGO guidelines allow developers to use AI as a development or learning tool, but they do not allow extensions to be entirely AI generated. I want to be transparent about how I used AI and make sure I am correctly understanding the policy. I have personally reviewed, modified, tested the code and used AI to write comments so i can upgrade later easily, but I understand that this alone may not necessarily mean the extension is considered compliant with the guideline. Could you please clarify whether the current implementation would be considered AI-generated under the EGO policy? I am happy to make any necessary changes and ensure that the final submitted version fully follows the EGO guidelines. Thank you for your clarification and guidance.
meharehsaan auto- rejected
Auto-rejected because of new version 2 was uploaded