Desktop widgets: clock, calendar, weather, photos, and battery.
Note: Binary files aren't shown on the web site. To see all files, please download the extension zipfile.
This code seems to be generated by AI. Please note, we have a rule for that: - [EGO Review Guidelines: AI](https://gjs.guide/extensions/review-guidelines/review-guidelines.html#extensions-must-not-be-ai-generated) - [Extensions Best Practices Guidelines](https://gjs.guide/extensions/review-guidelines/best-practices.html#submissions-require-maintainership) If you need any help with your extension you can ask us on: - [GNOME Extensions Matrix Channel](https://matrix.to/#/#extensions:gnome.org) - IRC Bridge: irc://irc.gimpnet.org/shell-extensions
Hello, there was some AI use during the development of this extension, however, I personally reviewed the extension line by line and understand how it works. I have been developing websites, and apps with javascript for a while now. I can understand the code and I can maintain it as I have proven with another extension I maintain, Mirror. I have also contributed code to gnome shell that got merged. AI was mostly used as a learning tool here, most widget extensions stopped showing the widgets during animations, so I used AI as as a learning tool (and I learned I could use Clutter clones). I looked at the rules (links) and I believe I am not violating any rules: "While it is not prohibited to use AI as a learning aid or a development tool (i.e. code completions), extension developers should be able to justify and explain the code they submit, within reason.". However, if there is a particular rule that is being violated, then I would love to know which one it is so I can fix it. :)
Perhaps I could submit another version of this extension with personal comments proving I know how the code works?