It's ok now but what is the reason for BSD 2-Clause License? Since you are adding something to GNOME Shell, it means the license should be GPLv2 or later. Picking another license is more appropriate for the things out of GNOME Shell scope. For example, a gtk app shipping with extension (app can be in other license but the code touching GNOME Shell should be GPLv2 or later).

That is the license under which the original creator of the extension licensed the shell extension: https://github.com/anduchs/audio-output-switcher/blob/master/LICENSE

Ok I approve this one but please note your code and all the older versions are still under GPLv2 or later as stated in Review Guidelines: > While your extension may include code licensed under a permissive license such as BSD/MIT, > you are still approving GNOME to distribute it under terms compatible with the GPL-2.0-or-later. https://gjs.guide/extensions/review-guidelines/review-guidelines.html#licensing If you have any question you can ask us on: GNOME Matrix channel: https://matrix.to/#/#extensions:gnome.org IRC Bridge: irc://irc.gimpnet.org/shell-extensions

Yes, indeed I agreed the terms where I approve GNOME to distribute it under terms compatible with the GPL-2.0-or-later.