Lightweight extension for on-the-fly manipulation to primary selections, especially optimized for Dictionary lookups For support, please report any issues via the homepage link below.
Note: Binary files aren't shown on the web site. To see all files, please download the extension zipfile.
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
| 81 | Active |
| 80 | Active |
| 79 | Active |
| 78 | Active |
| 77 | Active |
| 76 | Active |
| 75 | Rejected |
| 74 | Active |
| 73 | Rejected |
| 72 | Rejected |
| 71 | Active |
| 70 | Inactive |
| 69 | Inactive |
| 68 | Active |
| 67 | Active |
| 66 | Rejected |
| 65 | Active |
| 64 | Inactive |
| 63 | Inactive |
| 62 | Inactive |
| 61 | Inactive |
| 60 | Inactive |
| 59 | Inactive |
| 58 | Active |
| 57 | Inactive |
| 56 | Inactive |
| 55 | Rejected |
| 54 | Inactive |
| 53 | Inactive |
| 52 | Inactive |
| 51 | Inactive |
| 50 | Rejected |
| 49 | Inactive |
| 48 | Rejected |
| 47 | Active |
| 46 | Inactive |
| 45 | Rejected |
| 44 | Rejected |
| 43 | Rejected |
| 42 | Rejected |
| 41 | Inactive |
| 40 | Rejected |
| 39 | Inactive |
| 38 | Inactive |
| 37 | Rejected |
| 36 | Inactive |
| 35 | Rejected |
| 34 | Rejected |
| 33 | Rejected |
| 32 | Rejected |
| 31 | Inactive |
| 30 | Rejected |
| 29 | Rejected |
| 28 | Active |
| 27 | Active |
| 26 | Rejected |
| 25 | Inactive |
| 24 | Rejected |
| 23 | Inactive |
| 22 | Inactive |
| 21 | Rejected |
| 20 | Rejected |
| 19 | Rejected |
| 18 | Rejected |
| 17 | Rejected |
| 16 | Inactive |
| 15 | Rejected |
| 14 | Inactive |
| 13 | Inactive |
| 12 | Inactive |
| 11 | Inactive |
| 10 | Inactive |
| 9 | Inactive |
| 8 | Inactive |
| 7 | Inactive |
| 6 | Inactive |
| 5 | Inactive |
| 4 | Inactive |
| 3 | Inactive |
| 2 | Inactive |
| 1 | Rejected |
I'm sorry but I have to reject this one again, because this is really hard to review. and I see multiple `eval`s in the code that I cannot find the possible string they are trying to evaluate. and we still having hard time to follow how you remove those timeouts with `Symbiont()`.
> and I see multiple `eval`s in the code that I cannot find the possible string they are trying to evaluate. These strings to be evaluated are provided by the user via the settings. > and we still having hard time to follow how you remove those timeouts with `Symbiont()`. Would it help if I changed `Symboint` to the following `SourceManager`？ ```js export class SourceManager { constructor(host, removeSource, addSource) { host.connectObject('destroy', () => this.removeResource(), getSignalHolder(host)); this.addResource = (...args) => (this._delegate = addSource?.(...args)); this.removeSource = () => { removeSource(this._delegate); this._delegate = null; }; } refreshSource(...args) { this.removeSource(); return this.addSource(...args); } } ```
Yeah, it will be much better. It would be much nicer to see more readable code across all the lines. and for eval I cannot still tell that comes from gsettings.
> Yeah, it will be much better. It would be much nicer to see more readable code across all the lines. OK, please list other unreadable content that have to be changed. > and for eval I cannot still tell that comes from gsettings. I can only say that these strings are coded to be read from gsettings. If they were to come from somewhere else, I would also be curious as to where that might be. Do you have any feasible suggestions to make it easier to identify their source?
Maybe inside `getCommand()` (413 extension.js) we can have a more readable code. And it would be much better if `ldocr.py` could be hosted on `pip` as we mentioned in the review guidelines: https://gjs.guide/extensions/review-guidelines/review-guidelines.html#scripts-and-binaries btw, line 27 extension.js shouldn't be in global scope. It can be created inside `DictAct`.
>Maybe inside `getCommand()` (413 extension.js) we can have a more readable code. How about `return (name && this._scmds.find(x => x.name === name) || this._scmds[this.scommand]) ?? this._scmds[0];`? > And it would be much better if `ldocr.py` could be hosted on `pip` as we mentioned in the review guidelines: btw, line 27 extension.js shouldn't be in global scope. It can be created inside `DictAct`. Fine, the future uploaded version will not include `ldocr.py`.
Yes, it's better. Thanks!
Light Dict